Shareable evidence card

Misleading

A judge ruled that Hobart illegally approved the data-center project.

No. The reviewed orders do not declare the project illegal; the only final merits ruling identified confirmed the City’s ERA and real-property tax-abatement actions.

What the reviewed record shows

On February 18, the court denied the residents’ tax/ERA petition and confirmed the Common Council’s ERA designation and real-property abatements. On March 26, a different court dismissed or barred the first-fill-permit challenge because the plaintiffs had not exhausted the City appeal process and had not timely filed the administrative record; it expressly did not reach the requested preliminary injunction. Reconsideration was denied April 13. Later fill-permit and site-plan claims remain pending, so the record is favorable to the City on the issues already decided but is not a blanket ruling on every project approval.

Verification path

Start with the cited source records through Research Pass, then compare this finding with the broader record and later document versions.

Last reviewed: August 31, 2026. Original records control.

← Review all claims and evidence ratings

Help keep the record current

See an error or have a source?

Send the claim or application page, your supporting source and a short explanation. Corrections are reviewed before publication.

Submit a correction or source →