Facts Over FearHobart data centerWatch this project
Explore all topics

Understand the project

Project factsPower & gridAir & generatorsCommunity agreementsLand & water

Review the public record

Search the applicationPermit & lawsSource libraryUpdates & methodologyPrintable evidence brief

Context and participation

Court statusCommunity webinarLebanon comparisonLocation mapWatch this projectSubmit a correctionPublic correction ledger
Menu

Start here

Project factsPower & gridAir & generatorsCommunitySubmit a correction or source →

Explore all topics

Understand the projectProject factsPower & gridAir & generatorsCommunity agreementsLand & water
Review the public recordSearch the applicationPermit & lawsSource libraryUpdates & methodologyPrintable evidence brief
Context and participationCourt statusCommunity webinarLebanon comparisonLocation mapWatch this projectSubmit a correctionPublic correction ledger

Shareable evidence card

Unsupported

The submitted Hobart design establishes a 97% particulate-emissions reduction.

The 97% figure is not supported by Amazon’s Hobart application.

What the reviewed record shows

For its potential-to-emit calculations, Amazon uses 68.6% as the conservative filterable-PM control efficiency. The application lists manufacturer options ranging from 68.6% to 75.6% for filterable PM and says the final control-system selection had not been made.

Primary evidence

Open the underlying records

Amazon Data Services application for New Source Minor PSD/EO Construction Approval and FESOPApplication page 7

← Review all claims and evidence ratings

Help keep the record current

See an error or have a source?

Send the claim or application page, your supporting source and a short explanation. Corrections are reviewed before publication.

Submit a correction or source →