Facts Over FearHobart data centerResearch Pass · $11.99
Explore all topics

Understand the project

Start here / current statusProject factsPower & gridAir & generatorsCommunity agreementsLand & water

Review the public record

Research Pass document searchPermit & lawsSource libraryUpdates & methodologyPrintable evidence brief

Context and participation

Court statusCommunity webinarLebanon comparisonLocation mapWatch this projectSubmit a correctionPublic correction ledger
Menu

Start here

Project factsPower & gridAir & generatorsCommunityResearch Pass · $11.99Submit a correction or source →

Explore all topics

Understand the projectStart here / current statusProject factsPower & gridAir & generatorsCommunity agreementsLand & water
Review the public recordResearch Pass document searchPermit & lawsSource libraryUpdates & methodologyPrintable evidence brief
Context and participationCourt statusCommunity webinarLebanon comparisonLocation mapWatch this projectSubmit a correctionPublic correction ledger

Shareable evidence card

Not independently verified

The submitted Hobart design establishes a 97% particulate-emissions reduction.

The 97% figure is not supported by Amazon’s Hobart application.

What the reviewed record shows

For its potential-to-emit calculations, Amazon uses 68.6% as the conservative filterable-PM control efficiency. The application lists manufacturer options ranging from 68.6% to 75.6% for filterable PM and says the final control-system selection had not been made.

Verification path

Verify this topic

Start with the cited source records through Research Pass, then compare this finding with the broader record and later document versions.

Last reviewed: August 31, 2026. Original records control.

← Review all claims and evidence ratings

Help keep the record current

See an error or have a source?

Send the claim or application page, your supporting source and a short explanation. Corrections are reviewed before publication.

Submit a correction or source →